SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (49358)6/7/2002 9:53:17 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I would (if deciding the case) clearly limit it to cases where the man knew the woman who conceived the child and where a relationship existed between them, and where insemination of the woman was contemplated by both parties before the death of the man. Thus eliminating the possibility of sperm donors coming under the precedent. It would be easy enough to say explicitly that the decision does not apply to sperm donors.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News