To: Zardoz who wrote (86593 ) 6/7/2002 9:38:01 AM From: E. Charters Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116834 So you believe in paper money empires? I would say all free floating currencies, which I would argue they can never really be, have a semi-ballistic trajectory. That you can read about, if you read history. Even if you did not understand squat about economics, if you could read the history of China, England and France, and pay attention to what happened to their societies when they started printing paper money, you would not blither on about governments' rights to determine money supplies by fiat. Do I have an answer as to what they should do? No. And neither do you or Greenspan. The problem has not been adequately solved by the best minds of our generation. Keynes was prejudiced and he spawned a whole generation of knee-jerk liberal ecomists who only saw part of the problem and misinterpreted his thoughts on the solutions to boom-bust economies. Gold as as tool to determine the worth of the currency is a good one. It is either that or depend on government statistics. Neither is a complete independent of the other. You are supporting a position of divesting gold. You do not have adequate reason. It is cant. Face one fact. A thing can be valuated in terms of what people will pay for it in a free market. A promissory note, which is what all stocks, bonds, currency and creditory account entries are, cannot be valuated for its truth , or dependability by contrast. The thing, or product, or commodity cannot, even as an entry, inflate. That is why banks never paid interest on gold deposits. Only the note can inflate. The "thing" has constant value. The note decays in value over time. Why is that? It is partly so that bankers can make money on that which they create, i.e. notes of credit, whereas that which they cannot, which are things, commodities or products, are devalued . It was not always so. Bankers used to pay interest on deposits of land, jewelry, silver, and gold. Monetary systems have evolved into political tools which are used as a means of controlling economies. They have become ends in themselves. The great things of value in this world have received scant attention from the monetary systems. People's intellect is not valuatable by banks. Land is scorned by banks, as is gold, and other properties. They laugh at companies' receivables, they value only the associations of their monetary cronies. In this manner the people who run businesses by production cannot control their businesses. They are controlled by people who shuffle paper, like the Robber Barons, lawyers, funds, and greenmail artists. These are the people that you represent. Paper thieves. EC<:-}