Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (31806)	6/7/2002 11:45:49 AM
From: paul_philp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Win, On the other side you have the chosen few picked up by the conservative "think tanks", "think tanks" which do "research" that exclusively supports their preconceived positions, and the legions of bloviating pundits dedicated to propagating the conservative orthodoxy of the day. This is a two way street. There are one or two green think tanks selectively editing the good works of scientists to suit their own purposes. I suppose liberal pundits are saintly and conservative pundits bloviate. BTW, there has been a wonderful debate happening for several months on the Scientific American web site about the science behind global warming. It started with a negative review of the book, "Environmental Skepticism" and the authors response. It captures the flavor of the scientific debate in one place. Paul