SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (261)6/8/2002 1:22:00 AM
From: Jim Willie CB  Respond to of 89467
 
all this talk of economic recovery can be reasoned through
I believe we have a very weak recovery in progress
but it is funded and inspired by low-rate credit
ok, so inventory is low and will be replenished, fine
and wage costs are dropping, which helps profit margins
and business investment is getting off its back, fine

but that does not mean earnings will amount to much
every time a company beats the street, lowered EPS exceeded
valuations are still very high unfortunately

I see end of the road on high dollar valuation
on high bond valuation (corresponding to low interest rates)
on high stock valuation (relative to earnings)

it is an worthwhile lesson to extract the earnings yield on stocks
take expected this year earnings and divide by stock price
it comes to under 2%, just like shorterm TBill yield

so one can argue that both TBills and S&P earn under 2%
take 1/PEratio in other words to get pct return
end of the road is my conclusion
we have near zero real rate of return from stock investment
and the argument for continued migration into gold
it dont cover inflation after taxes

even though the economy may recover, stocks are priced in such a high manner that it still is NOT worth the price
the issue is NOT whether the economy recovers
the issue IS whether we wish to earn under 2% for stocks
IT IS NOT WORTH IT, SINCE IT DOESNT COVER INFLATION AFTER TAXES

we have the extreme having been reached in dollar, bond, stocks
no way out for paper-based assets
this is why GreenSnot is caught in a box, and it is sad

thus gold is set to begin its long rise
not just for a few months as the supposed "experts" claim
their entire livelihoods depend on that NOT happening
but we are in the same corner as Japan
gold should be rising thru several critical stages
first to #330, then #375, then #400, then maybe a rest
then to equilibrium price to satisfy supply meeting demand
that is believed by mining experts to be #600, give/take

one of two outcomes must happen now:
1. we proceed to have TBonds head to zero interest rate
2. gold is set free to rise to a multiple of current price

either we proceed down Japan's path
or reverse the GOLD SUBSIDIES OF BONDS
gold is now half its equilibrium price
and 5x as many dollars exist since 1980
do the math to get a justified #3000 price
that could be a real price target later this decade

in 1994 who would have said that EMC or DELL would rise 150x ?

Greenspanker has shown his tendency clearly
he will REFLATE, and induce price inflation
he has often decried the Japanese path taken
he will soon tolerate inflation to rid deflation conditions
but he will NOT be able to contain GOLD
their only recourse is to open the Fed doors to more gold sales
and with all the newly generated publicity of gold leasing and sales over the past decade, his hands will be tied

I believe GreenGrinch will sell gold only to relieve upcoming DESTABILIZATION and DISORDER within the gold market
it is coming as sure as night follows day
some dislocations are coming soon
some derivative meltdowns will create big big updays for GOLD
Hathaway of Tocqueville says +25 updays
but Central Banks will attempt to restore order
they had their day
and now it time for their night

/ jim (in Ohio visiting college buddy)