To: Neeka who wrote (261980 ) 6/7/2002 10:02:40 PM From: MSI Respond to of 769670 Good question. Answer: no one No one can be trusted to handle Royal power, for very long. As it is, there is so much absolute authority to conceal and deceive within the intel services and executive branch, it is already an autocracy, by those that run the secret agencies and the military. Clinton benefitted from dealing with the profiteers, but wasn't inclined to, for example, make secret the last 20 years' presidential papers. Now, the profiteers themselves are in office. You can see the difference, in only 18 months. And it continues. Congress is pretty ineffectual on most counts. The framers figured it would be better that way, to have checks and balances, and a not too efficient government. Now, it looks too efficient. What the framers didn't anticipate was the overwhelming authority the executive branch would have. This new agency will have powers that the Executive wants, and likely the oversight will be symbolic rather than actual. Already, it's "authority" is officially very limited, wrt intel services, so what will the 14,000 people do? Answer:probably nothing of much use to the American people, but be another 14,000 to do the bidding of the all-powerful executive branch. When you say "real measure", keep in mind what history has shown, about being "truly threatened". That's a decision for the people, not the all-powerful central government, that has an appetite for "threats", real or imagined, that keep the bureacracy going, to keep sucking tax dollars out of citizens' pockets, and keep manipulating the media to befuddle as many as possible. That's why it must be made illegal to covertly influence the media, with any government dollars.