Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (262020)	6/8/2002 12:48:07 AM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

OK, have it your way. If it includes stinger missiles I don't want a stinger missile, and the Second Amendment does not make me have one. It doesn't make you carry a handgun either, so what is your problem? If my logic is convoluted, you have none. There is no defense and no reason for your position, and you should just drop your opposition to other people's rights.

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (262020)	6/8/2002 1:13:31 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

What makes you think we DON'T have Stingers?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (262020)	6/8/2002 7:02:06 AM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

<<If, as you claim, the 2nd amendment should apply to all citizens instead of those in a 'well-regulated' militia, then they should have access to all arms necessary for that militia. Thus, they should have access to the aforementioned modern militia weapons.>> When I was in the 581st ambulance company I would say that I was part of a 'well-regulated' militia, as it was part of an Army MASH unit. If I had been caught with a Stinger missile or a grenade I'd still be doing time in Levenworth.