Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alex MG who wrote (76308)	6/8/2002 9:03:13 AM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

if you weren't such a closed mind idiot you would have gotten to poll that would show how wrong you are. How much crow do you blokes need to eat before you finally barf. Always a delight to pop in on Zeev's thread and hear from you terminal tech heads. Max p.s. if you read poll you will find out you represent the great 10% of present cellular users that would forsake their regular telephone. But BECAUSE YOU think this is right, therefore it's what the rest of cellular users will do. That sir is a lesson in how NOT to make investment decisions. Hardcore tech-heads are buried in tech because they are CULTIST and NOT investors. Max

To: Alex MG who wrote (76308)	6/8/2002 10:01:13 AM
From: mishedlo	Respond to of 99280

Alex I do not know if wireless will "happen" or not, but if it does it will be far slower than anyone thinks and there will be zero profit in in due to intense competition. To the extent that EVERYONE except rice paddy farmers in China already has a wireless phone (and rice paddy farmers in China will not have them EVER), wireless already has happened and there was indeed no profit in it. As for other wireless devices, who knows. As for flat panel TVs, look at the hype and crash on GNSS and show me the profit. OVERCAPACITY and TOO LITTLE DEMAND. It will stay that way for years. Bet Earlie agrees. ggg M