SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (11994)6/8/2002 7:16:08 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 57684
 
India Tech Industry Edgy About War

By S. SRINIVASAN
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER
Friday, June 7, 2002
Last updated at 6:07:00 AM PT



BANGALORE, India -- With India and Pakistan poised on the verge of war, the leaders of India's booming high-tech sector worry that a current spate of canceled business trips will extend into a slowdown in foreign investment or sales.

U.S. companies with Indian operations, such as Hewlett-Packard, Sun and Intel, have banned nonessential travel to India or raised security alerts - or both. HP has told its 2,600 employees, mainly Indian nationals, that they can leave the country if they feel at risk.

"We are beginning to see some customers and prospects canceling their business visits to India," said Kiran Karnik, president of India's National Association of Software and Service Companies. "If the tension prolongs, it could hit business opportunities abroad for our software companies."

Fears of a nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan have escalated in recent weeks - although Wednesday brought some easing of tensions when Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee called on Pakistan to jointly monitor their disputed Kashmir border.

India's powerhouse software sector - worth 370 billion rupees ($7.7 billion) in the year ending in March - has two-thirds of its customers in the United States. As tensions worsened between India and Pakistan, the State Department last week urged the 60,000 U.S. citizens in India to consider leaving.

Karnik, who did not have precise figures on cancellation of visits by prospective customers, said they had not yet led to any drop-off in new orders. However, he said that could change in the face of a drawn-out standoff.

"We only hope for an early end to this," he said.

Top Indian software firm Infosys Technologies - based in the southern city of Bangalore, India's Silicon Valley - also said some customers were calling off planned visits.

"We have not seen any material impact on our business so far, but if the situation worsens, there may be concerns," said Nandan Nilekani, Infosys' chief executive officer.

Senior officials at high-tech firms say they are making contingency plans, such as copying data and programs to enable them to operate from "mirror locations" abroad in the event of a catastrophe.

The Sept. 11 attacks - coupled with that of Dec. 13 on India's Parliament - were a wake-up call on the need for disaster planning, said Karnik. "By now, we know how to cope with such uncertainties," he said.

Hewlett-Packard Co. spokeswoman Rebeca Robboy said HP permits employee travel to India only if critical to the business, and an HP general manager must sign off on any such trips.

Intel Corp. has told its 1,200 Bangalore-based employees, mainly Indian nationals, about the State Department advisory last week, and is discouraging travel there, said Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy.

Security at Sun Microsystems Inc.'s India operations, which employ 400, is on high alert, said spokeswoman Kelly Long, declining to discuss details.

None of the three companies said employees had been evacuated.

India's fast-growing business process outsourcing sector, which handles tasks such as salary accounting and support, is experiencing some concerns, said L.S. Ram of Crossdomain Solutions.

"If it goes on for more time, we may be driving away business opportunities in this sector," Ram said. "Some clients are already on the pause mode as far as decisions to hire Indian companies are concerned."

Like others in the industry, Ram predicted a short-term crisis would prove a mere blip, with customers moving ahead with plans to do business in India as soon as tensions ease.

However, high-tech leaders - and the Indian public - were skeptical that the current conflict would escalate into nuclear war.

U.S. investment in India is a factor behind continuing U.S. pressure on Pakistan to cool things off, said Ram.

"Both countries are playing games by talking of their nuclear strengths, but there is no real danger," said Karnik. "India and Pakistan will not want it. Neither will external powers."

---

On the Net:

www.nasscom.org



To: Bill Harmond who wrote (11994)6/8/2002 9:02:49 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57684
 
The End of Irrationality

(an article complements of the Gorilla & Kings website)

Alan Greenspan started it. In a speech to the American Enterprise Institute on December 5, 1996, he made his infamous “Irrational Exuberance” quip. Ever since, ‘irrationality’ has been the sound bite for the economy and financial market. First, the ‘irrational’ technology bulls and their corrupt Wall Street accomplices consumed billions of dollars of capital while driving the NASDAQ from 1500 to 5000. Now, the ‘irrational’ bears have closed the capital markets for technology while driving the NASDAQ back down to 1500.

The irrationality stops now.

The cycle we have just witnessed is nothing new. The boom-to-bust cycle has repeated many times over the past two hundred years. New technology fuels this cycle. Since the first commercial steam engine, the economic promise of a new technology attracts too much capital. The result is a boom and inevitably boom turns to bust. The previous boom-bust cycle happened from 1980 – 1984 with the introduction of personal computers. Previous boom-bust cycles, on the scale of the Internet cycle, have happened with the automobile, railroads and canals.

The real economic impact of new technology is not seen until after the bust. Growth is built on top of the technologies and companies that survive this cycle. In fact, this is the function of the boom-bust cycle. The boom feeds a burst of innovation and competition as differing versions of the new technology compete in market. The boom accelerates the maturation of new technology through this process of hyper-competition. The capital starvation of the bust forces a switch from technological innovation to economic innovation.

It is the application of the new technologies, not the development of the technologies themselves, which spur sustainable economic growth. The technological-driven growth following boom-bust cycles is both robust and rational. In the decades following the invention the boom/bust cycle, industries form, populations migrate, social structures transform, and a new class of wealth creators emerge.

Contrary to popular belief, the role of technology in driving economic growth and wealth creation was not just recently discovered by Paul Romer and the Chicago school of economics. The great Viennese economist, Fredrick Hayek and Joseph Schumpeter, did not first discover it. The critical role of new technology in creating wealth has been well understood by entrepreneurs and their financial backers since the beginning of the Industrial revolution for two hundred years.

Occasionally, a bust is exacerbated by disastrous monetary policy mistakes, as in 1932 in the US and the late 1980’s in Japan. While people of good faith can argue over the wisdom of fiat monetary policy, there is no evidence of disastrous monetary policy today.

Throughout the Internet boom-bust cycle business productivity continued to increase. Unemployment rose to no higher than 6% during the recession. Inflation is low and the threat of deflation has been eliminated. Interest rates are low. The US dollar is beginning to return to a healthier level. Household incomes and household debt service are growing at the same rate. The economic recovery has slowly begun and it promises robust growth.

Enough of the technological utopians promising a New Economy untouched by the messiness of free market capitalism! Enough of economic doomsayers threatening the collapse of the western economy! The era of irrationality is over and a new era wealth creation has begun. The shamans and hucksters of boom and doom have been replaced on center stage by the entrepreneur with vision and spirit.

Let the true Internet economic boom begin.

It is in this spirit that, beginning in July, the RTW Report will publish a two-part report on the history of the technological boom/bust cycle and how this history can illuminate the current state of the Internet revolution.

The first half, “The Mother of All Chasms” will expand Geoffrey Moore’s market development model to cover the entire history of Information Technology. The promise of information technology has yet to be fulfilled but the industry is at an inflection point, enabled by the Internet, when investment in technology will begin to produce healthy returns. This report will examine the challenges and opportunities ahead for the technology industry today as it begins to deliver real economic benefits.

The second half, “The Long Harvest” will present a mutli-decade model of technology maturity, drawn from examples of previous technology boom-bust cycles, to demonstrate that we are entering a long period of prosperity fueled by the Internet and the risk taking work of thousands and thousands of entrepreneurs. This period of prosperity is “The Long Harvest”, when the fruit of the seeds planted during the boom/bust cycle are gathered.