SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : A@P VOTE: Guilty or Innocent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PartyTime who wrote (349)6/8/2002 10:22:35 PM
From: Bear Down  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 717
 
just because some dolt headed long percieves himself to be hurt by tony does not make tony or any other short responsible for their financial ineptness that resulted in their supposed harm.



To: PartyTime who wrote (349)6/9/2002 12:55:58 PM
From: mmmary  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 717
 
party, "longs" will lie as they're promoters

That is what they are paid to do. I could go to those boards and one promoter will pretend to be ten longs going "tony stole my retirement money," "tony took my college fund," "tony took all my money and now my mom can't have that operation she needs..."

Anyone who would still be invested in those loser companies and stock scams are obviously in on the deal and not real "longs." The "longs" were only harmed by the company and themselves by not selling, shorting, selling and buying back on a rebound...

Also, I could go to two companies and there wouldn't be any "investors" Here is tony's track record mary.cc

were you a promoter in one of those stocks? is that your issue with tony? Did he out one of your tout job and you were stuck with your restricted shares?