SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: peter michaelson who wrote (77609)6/9/2002 10:34:57 PM
From: Captain Jack  Respond to of 122087
 
<<" would have gone unnoticed.">> LOL! Good one! eom



To: peter michaelson who wrote (77609)6/9/2002 10:41:17 PM
From: Bear Down  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
That's what seems unjust. Tony's activiities were examined by a grand jury in New York with a focus on terrorism. If Tony were not of Egyptian or Muslim ancestry, his crimes (if they were commmitted) would have gone unnoticed.

I think not. His broker turned him in for suspicious trading activity on Sept 10. Now I will grant you that if his broker knew he was egyptian that may have played a part in his decision to make the task force aware of Tony. But I have to think that when a task force on terrorism is alerted to someone they have to at least look and see. Now if someone in the position of a task force got the information about Tony trying emphatically to sell his children's "hold forever" trust fund long holdings and took a quick look what could he see?

1) recent trips to muslim areas and helped a defense lawyer of muslim rebels relocate to the US from kosovo.

2) His father has known ties to hamas as published somewhere recently.

3) His brother is a palestian symapathizer with many published writings that are anti israel

4) a convicted felon on probation

5) dual citizenship and egyptian passport

What did the task force do when they saw all this? They investigated and claimed Tony had no ties to terrorism that they found but at the same time they found two of their own allegedly on the take and giving tony confidential info. So they investigated further and the rest is in the indictment.

Where is the problem???

One thing you seem to forget is that Tony was turned into the task force by someone who he obviously trusted. This guy had to have believe something to turn in his own client even if he was wrong. The system worked fine and call it bad luck for tony if you want but I call it bad karma and gettin yer due.



To: peter michaelson who wrote (77609)6/9/2002 10:41:58 PM
From: Doug R  Respond to of 122087
 
I kinda think you're gonna need to tone down the cry that Elgindy is somehow being singled out by the feds for prosecution...besides the following, there'll be more.
comstockfunds.com
According to some reports the SEC is investigating at least 50 large companies, and it is highly likely that a number of them will run into some sort of trouble that will damage their credibility and rub off on the general market.
_____________________________________________

Stock prices have foundered this week as investors signal persistent concerns about corporate ethics. And no wonder. On Tuesday the CEO of the giant conglomerate Tyco, L. Dennis Kozlowski, was indicted on criminal charges of tax evasion. A jury is hearing closing arguments in the government's case against accounting giant Arthur Andersen for obstruction of justice. On Monday the senior vice president of troubled Houston energy trader El Paso Corp. was found dead, an apparent suicide. And Microsoft agreed to settle civil charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that it had misstated earnings.
.
Not to mention the hangover from last week's news. The erstwhile blue-blood stock broker Merrill Lynch paid a $100 million fine after a New York state investigation found analysts recommending stocks they actually believed were "dogs" or "junk." And Vice President Dick Cheney's former company, Halliburton, admitted it was being investigated by the SEC for reporting "unbilled collectibles" as revenue during the years Cheney was CEO. ________________________________________________.

And on the 9/11 front:

Police wire taps hint at knowledge of Sept. 11
Christopher Emsden Italy Daily June 06, 2002
Italian police believe that passports used by Islamic terrorists involved in the Sept. 11 suicide attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were prepared by a specialist living in Italy.
.
Evidence that an airborne attack was brewing was obtained by wire taps more than 14 months before the hijacking of four U.S. passenger planes last fall, according to a police report obtained by Reuters Italian-language service and posted on the agency's wire on Wednesday.
.
The report, dated May 15, indicated that Italian officials had quickly alerted their American counterparts, and that the FBI had collaborated intensely with Italian investigators since October 2000.
.
Two months earlier, police listened in on a conversation in which Abdulsalam Ali Abdulrahman, a Yemeni national, told Abdelkader Mahmoud Es Sayed, an Egyptian, mentioned "airplanes" and an attack in "that state" that would be reported "by all the world's newspapers."
.
"The fire has been lit and is awaiting only the wind," the Yemeni said.
.
A separate wire tap, dating to Jan. 24, 2001, caught Es Sayed, who had escaped Italian custody the year before, telling Ben Soltane Adel, his Tunisian driver on a road in Italy, to obtain "impeccable" passports for a particularly sensitive operation. Adel, who was convicted by a Milan court last month of producing false identity papers for would-be immigrants, was scolded for asking whether the passports were "for the brothers going to America."
.
"Never repeat those words even as a joke," scowled the Egyptian. "It is secret, secret, secret, as if you were protesting state security."
.
Abdelkader emphasized that the passports should indicate their holders were born in Europe or in the Middle East, and that they would be tested before being put to their final use.
.
The transcripts came up during recent trials in Milan of men suspected of having close links with Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network, most of them Tunisians and Algerians.
.
Just how much U.S. investigators with the FBI or CIA might have known or might have been able to know before Sept. 11 has stoked fierce debate in Washington, where some doubts remain over the precise identities of the 19 hijackers who died in the attacks that claimed 3,000 lives

c1.zedo.com

A Big Warning
Security Agency Intercepted Arabic Conversation that Spoke of the Sept. 11 Attacks, But Failed to Translate It in Time
June 7 — The National Security Agency intercepted and secretly recorded at least one conversation in Arabic before the Sept. 11 attacks in which the participants spoke about something big that was going to happen on that day, ABCNEWS has learned.
However, the information was not translated until after the attacks because agency officials were too swamped and overwhelmed with data, sources told ABCNEWS. This is the first reported intelligence information that referred specifically to Sept. 11 as a time for the attack.
Part of the problem, sources said, is that the agency, which coordinates, directs, and engages in specialized activities to protect U.S. information systems and produce foreign intelligence information, gets millions of pieces of information, and does not have enough analysts to search through it all and interpret it. Unfortunately, the Sept. 11 attacks illustrated that problem.

Some government officials downplayed the significance of this revelation to ABCNEWS, saying they get specific dates frequently in their intelligence gathering, and that this information was not specific as to place or mode of attack.

However, one source told ABCNEWS the information National Security Agency officials received was the kind of thing that might have prompted an alert, if it had been known to parts of the law enforcement and intelligence communities.

Latest Pre-Sept. 11 Failure

The revelation is yet another example of how the U.S. intelligence apparatus uncovered hints of the Sept. 11 attacks, but failed to use them.

Sources told ABCNEWS earlier this week that the CIA knew that two of the Sept. 11 hijackers met with al Qaeda operatives in Malaysia in January 2000 — more than 18 months before the attacks — but apparently did not convince the FBI to track them until less than three weeks before the attacks.

FBI agents were searching for the two suspected hijackers — Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar — in New York on Sept. 10.

And the FBI is still reeling from revelations of missed signals uncovered by field agents but ignored by headquarters.

An agent in Phoenix warned headquarters to investigate flight schools nationwide after he uncovered several students he suspected of links to terrorism. Then agents in Minneapolis tried to get a national security search warrant to examine the possessions of Zacarias Moussaoui, who has since been accused as the "20th hijacker", but were thwarted. Information in his computer and property included airplane plans and apparent links to terrorists, sources have said.

Such failures were the focus of hearings on Capitol Hill Wednesday and Thursday.

Consolidated Agency to Combat Terror

Perhaps in response to the questions surrounding the handling of pre-Sept. 11 warning signs, President Bush proposed creating a new Department of Homeland Security that would consolidate functions of several federal agencies to better combat terror at home. Bush urged Congress to support the creation of the agency, saying his purpose was not to increase the size of government but to increase its focus and effectiveness in the war on terrorism.

Bush's proposal marks a change in approach on combating terrorism at home. Soon after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, he created the Office of Homeland Security to coordinate the government's approach to domestic security and his goal was to avoid turning the office into a Cabinet position despite calls from lawmakers. One reason Bush wanted to keep homeland security out of the Cabinet was to provide some buffer against congressional questioning.

In the end, however, administration sources said, Bush decided a Cabinet position was the best way to change the government's approach to defense at home.

Reported by ABCNEWS' Pierre Thomas and Martha Raddatz in Washington, D.C.



To: peter michaelson who wrote (77609)6/9/2002 11:02:48 PM
From: Doug R  Respond to of 122087
 
Oh Noo!!! Not Martha Stewart too?!?!?!
They're singling out Martha Stewart...how DARE they!!!!lol

Martha Stewart's Call Questioned
Star Called ImClone Chief On Day She Sold Stock
By Justin Gillis
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, June 8, 2002; Page E01

Martha Stewart, the lifestyle maven, called the chief executive of a New York biotechnology company seeking information around the time she sold shares in the company, according to evidence uncovered by congressional investigators.

Stewart's call and stock sale were made the day before ImClone Systems Inc. learned that the Food and Drug Administration would not accept its application for a promising cancer drug, driving its share price down.

A log of telephone messages left for Samuel Waksal, who was ImClone's chief executive, shows that Stewart, a longtime friend of his, called him at 1:43 p.m. Dec. 27.

The log entry, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post, said: "Martha Stewart something is going on with ImClone and she wants to know what." A second sentence reported that she was on her way to a particular resort in Mexico.

Congressional investigators have found that the call was placed very near the time Stewart sold shares of ImClone then worth about $175,000, sources said. At the time, rumors were swirling in the stock market that bad news was coming for ImClone, but no specific information was public at that point.

Stewart is one of several people with ties to Samuel Waksal -- including two daughters, his father and several other relatives -- who sold ImClone shares just ahead of the bad news the company received from the FDA late Dec. 28. Investigators working for a subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and others from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department, are trying to determine whether any of those people traded on inside information, which would be illegal. The Waksal relatives who have spoken publicly have denied that they did so.

Lawyers for Stewart and for Waksal have told congressional investigators that Waksal never returned the Dec. 27 call and did not pass any negative information to Stewart. Waksal, who resigned as ImClone chief executive last month amid continuing controversy about his management of the company and its cancer drug, Erbitux, has stopped cooperating with the congressional inquiry.

Waksal has been subpoenaed to appear at a congressional hearing on the ImClone case next week but, because he has received formal warning that SEC action against him is likely, he is likely to invoke his Fifth Amendment right not to testify.

A spokesman for Samuel Waksal, Scott Tagliarino, declined comment. An attorney for Stewart, James F. Savarese, also declined to comment. A source close to Stewart said she had done nothing wrong. Stewart's lawyers have told congressional investigators that her stock sale occurred on Dec. 27 because she had decided, in a conversation with her broker some weeks earlier, to sell if ImClone's volatile stock fell below $60 a share. When the price dipped below that level the broker called and got her permission to sell before she placed the call to Waksal, one source said. ImClone shares closed at $8.45 yesterday, up $1.05.

Several sources said ImClone executives knew as early as Dec. 4 that they were in serious trouble at the FDA because of questions about the drug's testing regime. Previously, ImClone executives said they were as surprised as anyone when the bad news came out Dec. 28.

A Dec. 4 conversation between an FDA administrator and an ImClone vice president left little doubt that the company was in trouble, one source said. On Dec. 20, the source said, an executive at Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., ImClone's partner in developing Erbitux, called a different FDA official about another matter, and that official let word slip that the FDA was about to throw out ImClone's application for approval of Erbitux. Someone at Bristol-Myers passed the information to Harlan Waksal, who is Samual Waksal's brother and an officer of Imclone, on Dec. 25, according to sources familiar with the events.

Congressional investigators believe the FDA official simply made a mistake by speaking out of turn. The FDA has already conducted an internal investigation and did not fire the official, the source said. An FDA spokesman declined to comment on the specifics of the case but said the agency "takes very seriously" such allegations.

Rep. W.J. "Billy" Tauzin (R-La.), chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Rep. James C. Greenwood (R-Pa.), chairman of its subcommittee on oversight and investigations, have been leading the congressional investigation. They have scheduled a hearing for Thursday at which many of the central players, including Harlan Waksal, are expected to testify.



To: peter michaelson who wrote (77609)6/10/2002 1:41:35 AM
From: Edscharp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Peter,

"My question is why all the fuss about him when we see a veritable tsunami of securities crime on a daily basis all over the market with nary a prosecutor in sight?"

On the one hand, I find I agree with you remark to the extent that all laws should be applied fairly to all individuals. If there are indeed other short-traders who are extorting money from corporations or obtaining illegal sources of information then they ought to be given the exact same treatment as Elgindy.

On the other hand, your post seems to suggest that what Elgindy did should be ignored because others do it too.

Why all the fuss? Because he drew attention to himself by being abrasive, insulting and completely transparent with his heavy handed tactics. He step over the line. Or, at least, he is alleged to have done so.

He can afford some pretty good lawyers. He will get justice regardless of his heritage. Indeed, maybe even more than justice. OJ Simpson comes to mind.



To: peter michaelson who wrote (77609)6/10/2002 7:51:04 AM
From: tonto  Respond to of 122087
 
Quite possibly true. His alleged crimes may have gone unnoticed. The fact is, the crimes did not go unnoticed and he is charged with extortion...

If he is innocent, I truly feel sorry for him. If he is found guilty, I am glad the crimes were detected.

I am sensitive to the profiling, but am not as upset as you are regarding the grand jury investigation which lead to his arrest.

The broker at Shearson contacted the authorities and stated that Tony made his trade orders and comments regarding 9 11.
I do not know if he said an Egyptian made a call, or a client, or an Egyptian client called one day before 9 11 and
made the order and stock collapse prediction. With the emotions that existed at that time, I can understand why the call was made. Go back to that time and recall your own emotions...the call was not out of line...although the charges may prove to be regarding that...I do not focus much on that.

My concern is paying off the FBI and extortion. Those are serious charges and should not be ignored. We will see more detail in the near future when he has additional hearings, and at that time I believe we will all have a better handle on the validity of the charges.

Anything to do with 9 11 is news, and if it were not for that horrendous day, Tony would just be another guy arrested and not a story. But for now, 9 11 is a story and he is a byline to it.

If Tony were not of Egyptian or Muslim ancestry, his crimes (if they were commmitted) would have gone unnoticed.