You conveniently forgot 2 things, which also fits your Pump and Dump agendae...1) PAAS' press release states their final approval is going to be based on the receipt of the feas study, or didn't you read that. The feasibility results will be published, as part and parcel of their filings and annual reports. Or are you saying PAAS doesn't play by the governing securities rules???
Ayup, Of course, I "figured that out"...you see, I can read press releases...and I remember them, too.<LOL>.
And 2)
You were REPEATEDLY challenged to post your BAY sells on this thread, which you never did.
Tis one of the reasons you are guilty of the pumper and dumper label.
I knew you wouldn't.
And, shock shock, you didn't.
And you won't.
But you'll brag about them on your most recent update on your website...which was updated somewhere on or around May 12, 2002
See below for how any one can figure THAT one out...
OH, and 3)
Your PAAS sell was a long time ago as well, acc'd to your very same website, and you sold out of PAAS at $16 in 1997
So, how is it you NOW claim " you are very long PAAS and will be".... while it PAAS at the "lofty $7.73 level" now?
hmmmmmm
As far as your "OLD dates of publication" on your website, you and I both know how recently it was updated...
your "published trackrecord of calls" gives you away:
Back to your website "stale dating" claim:
1) You claim BAYwas updated prior to the takeover? ...that was a sale Yeah, right...
it says:Bay from 49c to $4.15--- 2000 to 2002...up in 40 months...
Here's a couple of hints for you about your ACTUAL, not so stale website update dates...:
2) Just under your Bay Boast: it says Metallica 26c to $1.80 (it was at $1.345 last on June 7th,2002.
WOW, you are just a dandy Merlin Magician now, and plumb prescient... aint'cha?
so just when did Metallica trade at $1.80? (If you need help, I'll go get it fer ya...) I'll grab a chart and you can
grab your non-existant trade confirm slips, deal?
AND...... while we are on the subject of your prescient call on Metallica....Here is your MOST RECENT: extremely funny post on SI's Metallica thread no less...:
OPEN QUOTE:To:Orwell who wrote (216)
From: Claude Cormier
Tuesday, Jan 11, 2000 9:56 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to 217 of 261
Orwell,
There are many screaming buys in the mining sector... but I am not sure
Metallica is one of them. First, the story with Cambior is still not clear and we
don't know what will happen of their option on Cerro San Pedro. Second, it is
not obvious that the locals want a mine at Cerro San Pedro. Third, Cerro San
Pedro needs $325 and up to go.
Despite all these negatives... the stock appears to be extremely cheap.
CLOSE QUOTE:
This is the only "RECENT" public post you made on the SI Metallica thread by the way...
So when, between your only public SI Metallica thread post on Jan 11, 2000
and June 7th, 2002, did you get a case of Metallica religion????
C'EST HILLARE!
3) and now we come to Glamis (dating issue)...you say you got $12? ----for a mere 17months of gambling?
It was at $12.19 on May 10th, 2002...
Yeah, reeeeeeal old update "date" on your website...a whole month, eh?
Just sell and tell, Claude...cut out the fancy boasting, scrolling HTML cutesy coding B/S.
OH and BTW,
But, here's the real kicker...how would you like to know who GLG noveau riche son and poppa is negotiating to buy RIGHT NOW? I know. Do you?
You be nice and I might tell you what low cost producer, C&M/mothballed mining company they are negotiating for...but you'd have to be reeeeeal nice, Claude...real REEEEAL nice. What do you think your chances are?
FWIW:
BAY is still a POS stock,
..... with a POS sulfide orebody( that won't see the light of day anytime soon)
......... and the ultimate dump of POS BAY to 15th ranked producer PAAS
the ULTIMATE DUMP!
OH, tell me again, now,....how can I have missed out on this 300-400% one when I didn't ever play it???
never wanted to play it,
and still would NOT own it
..... NOR the "explore co"
........NOR THE ACQUIRER
........... if you gave them to me today, post merger? as a a gift?
Here'syour first lesson...one doesn't "miss or lose"
when one puts their money into something else---which I have
which has better numbers
better financing,
better mgmt,
better strike length and intercepts
better assays,
better feas,
better world market prices for their products,
and which you aren't Pumping and Dumping!!!
I sure look forward to your answer about how that makes me a loser...
Oh, I participated in the rally allright...just not your "BAY PLAY"...
Now, how about that answer to my question about what you consider "long term" in your money management boast to Bob Johnson? |
