Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (49979)	6/10/2002 12:48:07 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 82486

vendetta? surely you jest

To: one_less who wrote (49979)	6/10/2002 1:07:43 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

Yes I guess so. In this case my opinion is based on qualified facts and events, while yours is based on what makes you feel better about things. Oh, Jewel. Why did you have to go and do that? I was prepared to end this with an I'm OK, you're OK statement. But you rejected my generous offer... They were to a third party labeling the behavior appropriately (even in a way the behavor likes to label it herself). <<label verb [T] She labeled all the packages and sent them out the same afternoon. To label (something or someone) is also to characterize them with a name: He didn't want to be labeled a complainer, so he didn't raise any objection to the extra work.>> You said that you were "labeling" X's behavior. The definition of labeling is to characterize with a name. My! What a coincidence! (Please feel free to read sarcasm in that.) As you've demonstrated over the past couple of years, unflattering remarks about X, even though completely justified, will never be tolerated on your watch. Hmmmmm. Now how is it, exactly, that I'm supposed to show that I don't tolerate the unflattering remarks I have, myself, made about X the last couple of days? Am I supposed to post to myself and and start bashing? LOL.