Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (49980)	6/10/2002 12:44:49 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Those weren't harassment. Your posting them for about the thousandth time insisting on putting your false spin on them which arises out of your repressed sexuality is. You need help. Get it.

To: E who wrote (49980)	6/10/2002 12:52:07 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

I don't care what he says about roller skates or keys I don't see that as harassment I see it as INSANITY and not on his part Your position is crazy as far as I'm concerned but you're certainly entitled to it but I doubt I will ever see it the way you do I'm with Justice Cardozo on this one The Timorous May Stay at HOME you cannot make the world safe for the most fragile people- there are laws, there are TOU, but making people tailor their lives to accommodate extreme fragility is too much of an incursion into the freedom of others If you are willing to tailor your life to so fit people, fine but it is not the duty of society to make everyone like you

To: E who wrote (49980)	6/10/2002 1:02:17 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I could post that to a dozen people from that era and it would invoke in them immediate nostalgia for that song well unless they'd forgotten the song, it was a while ago. But, so were roller skate keys so one would either not get the comment at all or associate it with the song. Especially in light of the other comments. Opinions on harrassment? Well we all have them. Then there is the actual litigated version that "logical" people are bound to when making a general reference. One person can claim her own standard if she likes and apply it how ever she wants; but, that isn't really logical in a discussion where such a universally accepted definition is available...well maybe it would be logical if the person was angry about something or had a vendetta against some of the participants in the discussion... A new problem occurs when an obvious interpretation for ungentlemanly behavior is clear...and the ungentleman says something like "it depends on what is, is," or, song, what song?