Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (50011)	6/10/2002 1:40:58 PM
From: E	Respond to of 82486

Was it CH's cologne? Is it he or I who keeps bring it up? We'll see. Are you trying to make an "incursion" on my "freedom"?! I'll delete all the posts on this matter and those tangential to it from my Inbox now. We'll see what conversation arises from you and CH on it in the absence of any posts from me on the subject. I'll check in later. it's about a quarter of two now. This will be interesting.

To: epicure who wrote (50011)	6/10/2002 1:46:02 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Oh, but X: Do reply, before we determine, by simply observing, who is engaged in obsessional allusions to... past matters, to this post, in which I ask why you say I called you a bitch for disagreeing with me, which of course is untrue: Message 17582052 Edit: all posts on this topic are now deleted from my Inbox. This dropped "disagreement" stitch will be my last reference to the Poet situation and its aftermath, unless someone who is obsessed with it raises it. DO reply, though. I want those who think I called you a bitch not because I said I would if you kept up the woof woof stuff but because, as you claimed, I "disagreed" with you, to know the truth.