SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (50141)6/10/2002 3:25:14 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
"so I proposed it."

It was a rhetorical challenge, not one that required agreement to be validated. You proved your point.



To: E who wrote (50141)6/10/2002 3:25:58 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I disagree. There is not one way, there are many ways. And unfortunately there would be many ways to look at any "results". Such a "test" framed by you wouldn't interest me about anything, not about global warming, not about porn, and not about who is or is not obsessed. Just as giving you my blow by blow comments on CH's posts has no interest for me, but obviously much for you- therefore to frustrate you, it is best I do not comment on the posts.



To: E who wrote (50141)6/10/2002 3:26:45 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Now, E.

You said you were dropping it all.

Then only an hour or two later, you're back at it.

It's beginning to show who is the obsessed one.

I suggest you get back to your full stop right away.