Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (14615)	6/10/2002 5:58:30 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 21057

Whew! There's another one..... This place is getting to be a dungpile too... JLA

To: The Philosopher who wrote (14615)	6/10/2002 9:28:04 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

Invading is cheaper than buying. Probably not. If we invaded Canada, oil production would be taken over by our own oil companies. We'd end up paying the same price for it that we're paying now. Hardly worth the trouble.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (14615)	6/10/2002 9:49:55 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

"Invading is cheaper than buying." Is it really? Have you noticed that Saudi Arabia has become very up to date. It was only one or two generations back that the country lacked modern resources and technology. Where do they purchase technology from? Where do they purchase education and services from? When they need parts or replacements do they order them from local industrial sites? There are none. Do you think that is only a result of being spoiled by oil money. No, it is by design. They are basically a non productive nation who pays the West for products and services. They are spoiled, dependant, and in debt over their heads and we have made every effort to enable the situation, because it fuels our economy and secures a political foot hold. Lets take another example: Egypt. This has basically been a welfare state for decades, although the World Bank has been forcing a turn toward free enterprise for the last ten years of so. We provide billions a year in foriegn aid and loans that they have no hope in paying back. Much of it is in dollars that are ear marked to be spent on American goods and services. It creates a dependency that we lean on when ever we need some political leverage in the area. It has worked very effectively from the 70s through the 90s. Why would you think invading would be a better deal?