Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (50227)	6/10/2002 8:03:05 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Anyone who was following closely would know my attitude toward sadistic porn (about the accessibility of such material to children) and would know what that post implied about CH. But how many read closely and how many don't? I felt it best to point out that it was a vicious lie rather than to just ignore it. If someone told such a vicious lie about you, I dare say you would correct them, too. When I saw you evade condemning that post in your reply to Jewel, was it (?), I was interested to see what your reaction would be if I asked you myself (you mentioned you hadn't been asked by one of the parties), because you have the reputation among some people for a partiality to X and CH when giving your reactions to interactions here. I haven't followed closely enough to know if that's the case imo, but I had noted that you seemed at one point to attribute the nature of many of X's posts, which seem very much consistent with her personality structure as we see it here, to "outside agitators."