SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (76891)6/10/2002 11:44:47 PM
From: JBullock  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 99280
 
Zeev,

Personally, I always thought Psoriasis was an excellent
business to get into...

Hope you are doing well these days.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (76891)6/11/2002 12:09:20 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 99280
 
Thx...
antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (76891)6/11/2002 6:40:38 AM
From: Earlie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Zeev:

CHF is a much larger market and is where the company is making the big bet. Not that I am knocking the Psoriasis results as they are excellent (a discussion with a participant knocked my socks off).

Burn rate will increase with the study, but this also brings the treatment much more quickly to market. The size of the study also speaks to a very strong belief that a successful result is more than likely.

If it continues to reap good results, the distribution partnership assures a quick market entry (and it wouldn't surprise me to see further distribution agreements surface).

No question the sector is under pressure, which could turn into a blessing. I like the fact that the company could be a lonely success story in a sea of crushed bio stocks.

Did I say anything about "salvation" or "being sure"? Doesn't sound like something Earlie would say.

Best, Earlie



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (76891)6/11/2002 8:37:23 AM
From: DD™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Looks like Hal has been laid to rest..

groups.yahoo.com

geocities.com

DD



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (76891)6/11/2002 3:13:33 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Respond to of 99280
 
as gold price rises, BOTH demand increases & supply drops

the demand side is a nobrainer, which is called "gold fever"

the supply side is more peculiar
sure, some mines will come online with higher POG
but it takes typically two years to renew production
meanwhile, the forward sales by hedged miners dries up
which drastically affects their cash flow
and even might drain cash, as they are now covering
see AngloGold, Barrick, Newmont (from Normandy acqn)
all the restrictions on cashflow affect production schedules

hedged miners have a very large vested interest in a downtrending gold price
even as it destroys their own industry
perhaps half the gold miners participate in this perverse game

but the other part of the supply side is ended gold leasing
and ended Central Bank outright selling
the leasing is their scummy little hidden offbook game
case in point with Bank of Netherlands

Message 17587976

recently announced South African nationalization of gold mines is also sure to inhibit production as inefficiencies mount
e.g. license fees to govt, higher miner wages, diverted profits, investment in communities, forfeited decision control, lost lustre of secondary issuances

higher demand, lower supply as price rises, wow!
I wonder what that Supply-Demand curve looks like vs Price
/ jim