SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (50429)6/11/2002 7:18:56 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Laz has just cause to present a defense and you have an obligation to support your allegations or come forth with some groveling and apologizing

The question I asked was why observations (in general) are so often perceived as charges. Clearly, you perceived my observation about what I thought triggered the latest flare-up as an charge, one for which I should apologize to Laz. My question was why the perception of an allegation. Can you tell me why? I did not intend it as an allegation. I was simply explaining my take on what prompted the flare up. I did not call upon Laz to account for what he did. I did not say he had committed any kind of foul. I did not criticize him. I merely expressed an observation on what happened as a basis for some group analysis.

When I express an observation about some thread phenomenon, I expect to hear comments like:

1) You're mistaken. You overlooked thus and such. It really happened thus.
2) Yes, that's what happened and this is what I think we can do to avoid that sort of thing.
3) Yes, that's what happened but I think it's a non-issue because...
4) You're focusing on the wrong thing. That doesn't matter. You should, instead, be looking at...
5) Quit beating a dead horse.
6) It's inevitable. Forget about it.
7) What are you smoking?
8) Etc.

I don't expect anyone to defend himself or apologize. I just want to analyze the phenomenon. That's a very neutral activity unless people are very thin skinned, which Laz is not. He and I have a good relationship and we tease each other all the time. There's no reason that I know of for him to take it personally. There's no reason that I know of for you to think I should apologize. Apologize for what? Had I made an accusation that turned out to be false, an apology would be in order. But I didn't even make an accusation, false or otherwise.

Back in the days when I worked for a living, one of the things I did was management studies. That's where an office isn't functioning well and someone like me goes in, figures out what's going on, and make recommendations. When I brief the management team with my findings, conclusions, and recommendations, they don't defend themselves. That's simply beside the point. Yes, I might say some things to them that are hard for them to hear but they accept them in the spirit in which they are given and I work with them to determine what changes to implement, if any. That's the context in which I make observations about thread activities and I'm asking why they are perceived as allegations. What about this venue makes observations seem like allegations?