SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fingolfen who wrote (166209)6/11/2002 5:18:21 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"I've heard the "monopoly argument" a lot of times... I'm not convinced it holds water. By getting out of Intel in 1998, you missed a lot of profit in holding Intel. I bought and sold several times from 1998-2000 and made a fair amount of money each time."

If you build your company based on a monopolistic profit margin and the margin drops...well I'd say some restructuring will occur...just to put it mildly.

RE: "Holding AMD long through that same time period would have netted nothing (unless you played the couple of peaks on AMD).

That's OK then. If Intel goes to 8 it's OK if as long as AMD goes to 2 because "Intel won"? What's that about rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic as she's slipping under? <G>



To: fingolfen who wrote (166209)6/11/2002 5:25:10 PM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
<I've heard the "monopoly argument" a lot of times... I'm not convinced it holds water. By getting out of Intel in 1998, you missed a lot of profit in holding Intel. I bought and sold several times from 1998-2000 and made a fair amount of money each time. >

Ah, the "greater fool" theory -- it works for a while, but in the end, the "greater fools" are left holding the bag.

Kap