Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (50548)	6/12/2002 12:30:02 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Uh...Authentic messages to the Thread require a read font in the title. duh

To: The Philosopher who wrote (50548)	6/12/2002 12:33:21 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

...."the thread should be aware that if I should do so in future I will not be violating any agreement or promise by doing so, but am free to do so without violating any commitments." You would be violating a great deal more and if you have never gotten that, there is no point in any agreements. ooo I got a feeling...ooo I got a feelinnnng deep in s'ide...ooo we are about to have a beanie babie encounter of the gropological ki'ind.. oo ooo ooo bee boppa dooo'ooo

To: The Philosopher who wrote (50548)	6/12/2002 2:27:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Why would you care whether he bans you or not? Why would you trust someone who dislikes you so much? Why would you expect someone who has such an animus to keep any promise of any kind to you? You have ample experience with him now (and with others). I really don't understand that. Expect people to do whatever they feel like, and justify it in unusual ways. Then you will never be disappointed. And if you don't like people who are into control, don't post where they can control you. Just my humble opinion.