Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (50729)	6/13/2002 8:42:13 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I agree. There was no contract, there could be no contract, and, in fact, it was a red herring.....

To: average joe who wrote (50729)	6/13/2002 12:43:05 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

You're right about basic contact law. Laz made an offer, if you agree not to post to or about Poet, I'll unban you from SMBR. I accepted. Those are matters of record on the thread. The consideration was mutual promises to perform. That's perfectly adequate consideration. That formed a contract. Contracts can be verbal and binding, but in this case it was in writing, clearly laid out here on the thread. Any first year law student could prevail on proving the existence of a contract.