Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (50839)	6/13/2002 3:18:41 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Yes, there has to be a meeting of the minds, but the question is how much meeting of the minds. There does NOT have to be a meeting of the minds that "I'm here forming a legal contract that if I don't perform could land me up in court." Instead, the meeting of the minds has to be such as to make the elements of a contract clear. "will you sell me your watch for $50?" "Yes." There's a meeting of the minds. Lots of things are unstated. Is the $50 Canadian or American or Australian? When will the transaction take place -- if I now say "Okay, give me the $50 now and I'll give you the watch in 10 years" consistent with the agreement? A court would probably say no. Is there a requirement that the watch be running? Not unless there is some statute to the contrary -- generally caveat emptor. Does the band come with the watch? If there were an argument about the contract, a court would have to sort all these things out. But it would almost certainly say that yes, there was a meeting of the minds on a contract for A to sell the watch to B for $50, and it would almost certainly enforce that contract. And if B offered $50 Canadian, assuming this happened on the streets of a US city, A could refuse to hand over the watch and sue B for $50 American, and win, because even though that wasn't specified in the agreement, the Court will insert that as a reasonably assumed term of the contract. On the other hand, if the conversation went "Will you sell me your watch?" "Well, yes, but I don't know how much I would want," then there's no contract because there is no meeting of the minds on a central element of the contract, the price. So what you need is a meeting of the minds on enough elements to make a clear contract, even though there are many potentially unresolved issues that might bring you before a court to resolve the details you didn't agree on. Gotta go meet a friend for lunch who on your suggestion I will sue if he doesn't show up. <g>