Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (50853)	6/13/2002 4:17:44 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 82486

I see. My apologies, then. However, reviewing what you have proffered as the contract, not only did you concede his right to ban you on whatever grounds subsequently, you also contracted merely to be unbanned in the first place. Thus, he performed his end. Nowhere was it specified that he could only ban you again for violation of toorabout, nor was it implied. There was nothing specifying further obligations or conditions whatsoever on him, only on you, insofar as you had to uphold toorabout to fulfill your end of the arrangement. Indeed, the way the contract is written, it looks like he has met his obligations, but you are still obliged to observe the toorabout, in consideration of his initial unbanning. I am sure that Laz, being big- hearted, will not sue.......