Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A@P VOTE: Guilty or Innocent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DaiTN who wrote (451)	6/14/2002 5:09:30 AM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 717

There seems to be plenty of people on SI who don't value character, honesty or trustworthiness as important criteria for who they follow and give their money to, as long as they make lots of money in return. If they knew there was no chance of being sucked into another RICO investigation - a very BIG if - my guess is he could seduce enough playground twerps into signing up again to make his Web site a going concern. I just doubt we will ever hear from Mr. Elgindy regarding the securities business ever again. Just my guess. For those concerned about Tony being libeled or slandered, let's remember who lost his most recent libel case. There are additional instances on the record on Si where Tony was less than "accurate" about certain posters' trades, results and associations. Does anyone think a jury would look at his record of abuse and then award him damages because folks said he was a dishonest butthead? Not me. Not any jury he ever saw, or any judge he ever appeared before. His credibility is gone, poof, bye bye, toast.