Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James H. Barnes who wrote (166423)	6/16/2002 1:28:01 AM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: Where'd you hear that? I don't remember. I've looked at a few of the usual suspects (Aces' hardware, sandpile, slashdot) and didn't find it. But I know that I read that someone claimed run time optimizations were being attempted for the McKinley follow-ons. That that might require OOE is my own speculation (it could have been in whatever I read, but I don't clearly recall that being discussed, while I'm sure I saw - somewhere - that the McKinley follow-ons would, or at least Intel would attempt to have them, include some run time optimization as X86 has had for many years. That's your first post since 1998 - what compelled you to respond to this particular post?