SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (32412)6/16/2002 1:27:47 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
A very interesting and detailed article on the nature of the Arafat regime, by Daniel Polisar, a former member of Peace Watch, one of the monitoring groups that oversaw the PA elections in 1996. Daniel Polisar is currently editor of the Israeli magazine Azure, in which the article appears.

A real look at the question of Arafat's legitimacy... has to involve a more serious examination of the origins of his rule in the wake of the 1993 Oslo accords-and particularly the crucial two-year period in which he established the Palestinian Authority and paved the way for himself and his loyalists to win a landslide victory at the polls. Such an accounting reveals a disturbing picture, of a PLO leadership that-after having been brought in from Tunis amid widespread jubilation-used every means at its disposal to ensure that the Palestinian voter would have only one viable option as to which political party would represent him, and only one real candidate to vote for as president. Under these conditions, Arafat's landslide victory was not an expression of democratic will, but rather a testament to the success of the measures he employed.

The story of how this came to pass is the subject of this essay. In it, I will document-in large part using original source material not previously published in the West-the rise of a regime characterized by a massive police force whose specialty was intimidation of political opponents; an executive branch in which Arafat alone made all major decisions and in which the civil service was reduced to a corrupt patronage machine; the institutionalized absence of the rule of law, and a judiciary that lacked any independence; and the intimidation of the media and human rights organizations, to the point that it became virtually impossible to transmit any message other than one personally approved by Arafat.


Yasser Arafat and the
Myth of Legitimacy
shalem.org.il



To: LindyBill who wrote (32412)6/16/2002 8:30:31 PM
From: unclewest  Respond to of 281500
 
Maybe we are doing more than comes out, but I don't see any stories about Terrorists going missing or turning up dead, which is what I would expect if we were getting these guys.

IMHO we are doing very well...the difference this time is the press is invited to very very few of the parties.