SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (32457)6/17/2002 8:29:33 AM
From: Zeev Hed  Respond to of 281500
 
Yes, but the supreme court decisions on which the Government justifies its current treatment of US citizen that are also "enemy combatant" relates to declared wars, I am not a historian, but I believe that all other cases are treated as spying or treason and go through the federal courts rather than the military route. It is a legal rather than moral point, yet, we pride ourselves to be a nation abiding by a set of laws, we just cannot brush away our constitution because it is convenient. Let congress declare war on international terrorism and be done with it.

I believe we are getting into a similarly gray area if we indeed invade Iraq, just because we "don't like" their regime, or because they have developed or are developing WMD. We did not invade India and Pakistan when they did exactly the same thing, and frankly, i see a greater danger of Al quaeda getting its hand on some Pakistany WMD, then Iraq's.

Zeev



To: Bilow who wrote (32457)6/17/2002 9:49:33 AM
From: Mao II  Respond to of 281500
 
"Only the really big ones get officially declared..."
And more often than not, that lack of declaration has led to big trouble, largely because the underlying policy was flawed. M2