Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M who wrote (79717)	6/17/2002 12:24:30 AM
From: Webster Groves	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 99280

<<If the UN is unwilling to satisfy our demands, then we may have to operate independently...>> But the ruse is the US must attack Iraq because it is in violation of a UN resolution. Seems we use the UN as a foil when it suits US policy, and ignore it otherwise. Say, did the US every pay up on its overdue UN dues ? China is far more a military threat to the US than Iraq, but I don't hear anyone saying bomb China. May that's cause China can fight back, and Iraq is second-rate. What does Iraq have to do with terrorism anyway ? Hussein will be dead in a few years from medical problems, why waste the effort. I think the latter point is critical. Apparently, the US must kill him before he dies, otherwise there is no "great victory". Also would help to do it a week or two before the Nov. elections. -wg