Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : GALTECH SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS CORP. (GTSM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gammaray who wrote (369)	6/17/2002 11:52:52 AM
From: Mahatmabenfoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 394

---I notice that between rb and si you post thru the night Glad to see you are such a devoted reader. I type quickly -- I bet you spend more time reading than I spend typing. Maybe I write these posts between psychotic sex with East Village 23 year old girl run-aways who've sought solace in Yoga with admirable results to their physique and energy. Bouncing vivacious things. Moody though. Good thing there's so many of them. They like to watch me type, and giggle at your persistent efforts to figure me out. But this isn't about me, it's about GTSM, and the fact that it has a long history no person who can read could take seriously. There are no answers to the things I've pointed out. Take a single issue -- the year wait for the written lab report that resulted in the pseudo scientific "white paper" written not by any lab, but by GTSM itself. Even the runaways without a science degree (you'd be surprised how smart some of them are) can see through that one. In it GTSM quotes a potential customer as saying something like "gosh, how did you do this?". Meanwhile the only sales since 1990 where the ones in 1997 that GTSM ---> LIED <--- about. Oh, excussssse me, I should say "planned sales" as thought that makes everything okay. Part of what makes me so confident is the verification of my insights over the past few years. I got fooled by ECO2 initially, believing its press releases announcing sales must have some basis in reality. But they didn't. Since then I've been able to read through the hype-screens of many other companies -- including TXMC and TRKR and INVT which I publicly called scams 2 or more years ago, and time has proved my insights correct. TXMC and TRKR in particular liked annoucing sales and planned sales, but the REAL $$ they added up to was basically -- NIL --. Remind you of anything? Time is already proving me correct with respect to GTSM. Norm bet me $50 (which of course he refuses to pay) that GTSM would have sales by the end of 2001. But it didn't -- and still doesn't, and until the lying machine of 1997 is back in full swing (which I have predicted for this year) it still won't. GTSM's sale of the motor for no money to a company with no money also confirmed my terrific insight that it really no longer owns the motor patent. -- are so repetitive No. For one thing, I often add new information -- the quotes from 1997 which you can't answer (that announced sales that never become real money) was only revealed last week. The real repetition on RB to which you refer is the repeated hype show of statements like "I hear the sales are coming this month!" which originate from GTSM itself, and are untrue. As long as that baloney is repeated, I can remind people to read the SEC reports, and TO think. I am the cure -- lucky for the world too. - Charles