SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: High-Tech East who wrote (12847)6/17/2002 1:35:16 PM
From: Steve Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19219
 
If this exchange is such an interesting soap opera, then its beginnings can be found at the following posts:

10337 and the thread of replies
10779 and the thread of replies
10806 and the thread of replies

10844 was the post where I decided arguing with JT was a waste of time. That was Feb 28. JT today accused me of crying like a girl and leaving the thread after being forced to cover a bad trade on Mar 7. I think he is confused cos Feb comes before March in the real world <vbg>

And the post about VXN being always right was actually "VXN never lies". It was a reply to a discussion about market sentiment. My point was that VXN is an accurate measure of what market participants are actually doing, whereas sentiment surveys are a subjective take on what people claim they might do.

Here's one such post:
siliconinvestor.com

BTW, the VXN did work, just that my risk rules got me out of the trade at a predetermined stop. Not only did it work, but the extremeity of the VXN move portended a very large subsequent drop. Since getting stopped out, VXN rose and the market went down way way below my stop point. And I made more money on the decline than I lost on the stopped out trade. I even posted my trades here on SI, along with reasoning at the time.

Why JT chooses confrontation rather than learning from other opinions is beyond me.