SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Opsware, Inc. (OPSW) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Venkie who wrote (112)6/24/2002 2:49:25 PM
From: Glenn Petersen  Respond to of 136
 
We all need some winners. I am not currently holding any LDCL but I am watching it with a lot of interest. They are lucky to have enough cash which allows them the luxury of tinkering with their business plan.

Loudcloud leaning on EDS deal

By Tiffany Kary
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
June 24, 2002, 9:55 AM PT

news.com.com

Loudcloud is betting its business on hopes that its licensing deal with Electronic Data Systems will be approved.

The company moved Monday to allay fears about the deal and to end concerns that it will face a cash crunch. Worries about Loudcloud sent shares tumbling after its auditor, Ernst & Young, issued a "going concern" warning and said the company will need more funding if the EDS deal isn't approved by shareholders.

The company said it expects the EDS deal to be approved, but it is still contingent on a shareholder vote. Shares continued their weeklong decline, however, falling 14 cents, or about 12 percent, to $1.08. The stock was almost $2 a share last Tuesday.

Loudcloud said last week that it would exit the Internet hosting business and change its name to Opsware.

Simultaneously, Loudcloud announced that EDS, of Plano, Texas, would buy its managed hosting business for $63.5 million and license its Opsware IT automation software for a total of $52 million over three years.

The problem? On June 14, Loudcloud bought $42 million of its own debt, triggering comments from its accountant, Ernst & Young, that the company could have trouble funding its business.

On June 17, Loudcloud announced the deal with EDS, which will provide it with enough cash, assuming it gets approved by shareholders and EDS doesn't back out.

In a proxy statement filed last week, Ernst & Young said the debt repurchase has put Loudcloud in a sticky situation. If Loudcloud doesn't receive estimated net proceeds of $61.5 million from the EDS deal and $9 million from a separate deal with Frontera, it could have trouble continuing its business, the accounting firm said.

Loudcloud said Monday that it is confident the EDS deal will go through, despite a pending shareholder vote. Loudcloud also argued that the debt repurchase that has created its auditors' financial concerns is part of a strategy to save it money if the EDS deal succeeds.

The Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Web infrastructure business, founded by Marc Andreessen of Netscape Communications fame, was one of the few companies to go public in the middle of the dot-com decline. But the company's initial public offering was far from successful, and Loudcloud has struggled with its business model.

On Friday, Loudcloud Chief Executive Ben Horowitz told Reuters that the debt purchase was a strategic move that would save the company $22.6 million if the deal with EDS were to be approved.

"The asset purchase agreement requires that a majority of Loudcloud stockholders approve the transactions," the company said in a statement Monday. Since Loudcloud's management owns 43 percent of the company's outstanding stock, and the board of directors has unanimously approved the transaction, chances are the deal will go through.

"We are highly confident our transaction with EDS will close as expected in September and very excited about the future of the business," Horowitz said in the statement.

Assuming the deal does close in September, Loudcloud said it expects to have a cash balance of about $65 million at closing. After closing, the company said it will burn less than $10 million in cash for the remainder of the calendar year.

The deal will also bring the company to cash-flow breakeven earlier than expected, by the second quarter of 2003, Loudcloud said. As a result, the company said, its cash balance will be above $50 million at cash-flow breakeven, and cash levels will grow after that.

As of April 30, according to the company's filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Loudcloud had $77 million in cash.



To: Venkie who wrote (112)8/10/2002 10:43:56 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Respond to of 136
 
Loudcloud investors OK managed services sale to EDS

SUNNYVALE, Calif., Aug 9 (Reuters) - Loudcloud Inc.<LDCL.O> shareholders have given the green light to the $63.5 million sale of its Web site management unit to Electronic Data Systems Corp.<EDS.N>, according to a preliminary tally of the vote announced Friday at a special Loudcloud shareholder meeting.

The deal's target closing date is Aug. 16, Loudcloud's Chief Financial Officer Ron Sherwood told Reuters.

At around the same time, Loudcloud will change its name to Opsware Inc. and file to swap its current Nasdaq ticker symbol for OPSW <OPSW.O>, reflecting the company's intention to focus on its existing software business, Sherwood said.

About two dozen shareholders gathered at a hotel in Sunnyvale, California, for the special meeting. Among them was retiree David Scheid, who said he owns several thousand Loudcloud shares -- some of which he purchased earlier in the day.

Scheid said he backed the sale, calling it a positive for the young company, which went public in 2001 at a price of $6 per share and now trades around $1.

"It puts them into a higher-margin business and gives them cash, which is key to survival," he said.

Prior to the EDS deal, Scheid said, the company's survival was a question.

In its brief history as a public company, Loudcloud has been forced to slash head counts and expenses in an effort to cool its cash burn and preserve capital. In June, it posted a fiscal first-quarter net loss that shrank 50 percent to $30.4 million as total revenue rose 50 percent to $17.4 million.

Loudcloud co-Founder and Chairman Marc Andreessen owns 10.5 million Loudcloud shares -- about 7.4 percent of Loudcloud's outstanding stock -- and said he will continue working full-time at the software shop.

"I'm hugely incented, from a personal standpoint, to work on behalf of the company," Andreessen said.

08/09/02 16:23 ET

Copyright 2002 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.



To: Venkie who wrote (112)11/29/2002 11:08:11 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Respond to of 136
 
Marc Andreessen on What's Next

Corporate IT is becoming commoditized, and companies are desperate to continue slashing costs. Automation, says Andreessen, is the answer.

FORTUNE.COM

Tuesday, November 26, 2002

By David Kirkpatrick

siliconinvestor.com

The other day Marc Andreessen gave me an impressively cogent analysis of what's happening in business IT. True, his ideas added up to an argument why his company, Opsware (formerly known as Loudcloud), would thrive over time. Call me gullible--after last week's column on Microsoft, plenty of you already have--but I think Andreessen's probably right on both counts.

His analysis begins with the observation that every component of modern technology infrastructure is rapidly becoming commoditized.

A few of his favorite points:

"Linux and Windows are winning--everything else is losing."

"You can replace a $300,000 Unix server with ten $3,000 Dell servers for a ten-times savings right off the bat--and they'll outperform."

Storage hardware has gotten so cheap--close to $1/gigabyte--that fully redundant storage for a big multinational company can now cost only around $300,000.

Bandwidth costs have plunged. Andreessen says that whereas Netscape paid about $1,600/megabit in late 1999, today the price is down to a mere $50.

It's all driven by Moore's Law, he explains--semiconductor costs, which underlie most tech advances, continue to drop exponentially, bringing down the costs of most core capabilities. But Andreessen thinks the reason we're seeing such dramatic across-the-board commoditization now is because of what he calls a "maniac" focus on cost-cutting among customers. "In 1995," he explains, "the reference architecture at companies was Sun/Oracle/EMC/Cisco, or their comparable competitors. That was still true in 2000 when the bubble ended, because people could still afford it. Now they can't."

Now customers are finally taking advantage of the commoditization that had been creeping along largely unnoticed during the boom. All this has created what Andreessen believes to be a one-time "systemic decline" in the cost of tech infrastructure. But of course it costs a heck of a lot more to operate all this stuff than to acquire it. Andreessen says it costs 6 to 8 times more over time. That's why IT staff constitutes, on average, something like 40% of the overall corporate IT budget. Getting rid of all those expensive people is a top corporate priority, because it would be the best way to cut costs.

Meanwhile, customers have been putting an essential task on hold--installing new applications. It's because there's not enough money, and because CIOs feel burned. Says Andreessen: "Most of the software ideas of the late '90s which people tried and failed on--customer relationship management, marketing analytics, supply chain management, B2B procurement--those ideas all made sense and had good business justifications. But the tech wasn't quite there. Many customers who bought early feel bitter. But at some point those things will hit the mainstream and work."

So now there is a growing backlog of applications that companies want to implement, even as they are desperate to cut IT costs and staff. "And automation," says Andreessen, "is the answer."

Historically every corporate application had its own hardware and infrastructure resources--dedicated servers, storage, and database. That's one reason the utilization rate for servers in most companies is only about 20%. Typically, SAP has its own infrastructure (probably multiple ones), and so does Siebel, supply chain, home-grown applications, etc.

That, says Andreessen, is increasingly becoming unnecessary. Now these commoditized components can become merely a set of generic resources to be used for any application at any time. This applies to servers, storage, databases, application servers, firewalls, data routers, and other parts of the corporate computing architecture.

Here's where the Opsware opportunity comes in. Its software allows resources to be pooled, with applications drawing on the aggregate infrastructure only when they need to. Explains Andreessen, who is Opsware's chairman: "Perhaps you need an application running on a BEA applications server on Red Hat Linux with certain approved security patches and a custom Java package--and all that for four hours. Then later in the day you can apply that same infrastructure for your payroll system."

So not only is the infrastructure itself getting cheaper to acquire, but companies can also utilize and manage it all much more efficiently. That's better than average news for CIOs.

It's still early in this transition. Few companies are yet taking full advantage of it. But Andreessen's view isn't radical, and Opsware isn't the only way to get savings and improve systems efficiency. What Andreessen is saying echoes Sam Palmisano of IBM when he talks about On Demand computing. It's what HP's Carly Fiorina was talking about in her speech at Comdex when she spoke of "adaptive infrastructure" and "virtualization to achieve better capacity utilization." Andreessen explains it more clearly and eloquently than either of these two computer makers because he has a lot less invested in the old world.

Opsware itself is now just a software company. It sold off its services business to EDS and dropped the Loudcloud name earlier this year. Andreessen sees huge opportunity selling Opsware's management software to both companies themselves and outsourcers who provide infrastructure remotely. The company has $65 million in cash and plans to be cash-flow positive by the middle of 2003, largely because of guaranteed revenues tied to the EDS deal. Like I said, I think they'll do fine.

Questions? Comments? E-mail them to me at dkirkpatrick@fortunemail.com.