Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (51248)	6/17/2002 3:58:30 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 82486

I think there is a difference between recognizing genius and recognizing different levels of artistic expression. And I don't think it can all be expressed in a rubric, not matter how well drafted. But before I go into that further, may be I'm misunderstanding the extent to which you think rubrics can go. Can you point me to any rubrics that you think are particularly good? I don't know whether any professors post them on websites. I'm wondering, for example, would a rubric include such things as using complex sentence structures (and if so, how complex)? What would a rubric do with some of Shakespeare's grammar, for example? Or Donne's? I adore much of Donne, but it can take me a while to unpack some of his grammar. Is that good writing, or bad? Can any rubric deal with it?