Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (78169)	6/18/2002 8:15:46 AM
From: Jay Fisk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

All things considered.... I think A&P is in a better (less worse) position than Agent R.... who probably signed off on a crispy Nondisclosure Agreement safely archived deep in his personnel files... open and shut case... whatever the level of classification disclosed ... guilty as charged... screeching career halt... don't pass go. IMO, the OpSec issue has more gravity.... whereas ""conspiring to violate FBI database security"" implies more of an active hack-attack than alleged profiteering from 2nd hand information.... Farfetched stretch.... A&P pressurecooked / recruited as a federal ferret to weed out weak agents ? A textbook technique of the Internal Affairs / CounterIntelPro guys.... hmmmm.... 100% agreement on CNN... though the door spins in both directions....