Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (51336)	6/18/2002 11:53:30 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

LOL! I never claimed to be on any moral high ground XXX. I'm certainly not a pompous, condescending phony like yourself. And, more to the point, I'd rather be "disturbing" than "disturbed", like you any day of the week..... JLA

To: epicure who wrote (51336)	6/18/2002 12:10:30 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Unlike you, I have no need to make up fancy dehumanizing names for my fellow posters. and At the most I disagree with them OMG. Girl, you carry self-delusion to heretofore unchronicled heights. How about 'molester' and 'liar' as dehumanizing, vilifying names?! I could compile such a compendium of noun-avoidance vilification! But alas, although art is long, life is brief, and I must go. And "fancy" they sure are, in that they are representative examples of your habitual name-calling style -- Calling someone a molester w/o the use of the noun. Fancy, indeed, and clever, too, enough so that it evidently fooled you yourself! I've pointed that out before -- your method of namecalling and vilfying. There is no more vicious and dedicated vilifier on SI than you. You even vilify the newly dead to the decedent's mourners. Jesus, X. Your friend CH [JUST KIDDING! I know you don't like him! I know you disapprove of his behavior! You don't even fraternize in a way that would cause confusion, you don't even offer him moral support during his slanders and 'molestations,' no, pas de tout! I know this because from time to time you post that disclaimer!] utilizes that same name-calling method, so I wonder if that shared skill represents something common in your background. (Name Calling Without Nouns 101?) Please do not say again that your reactions are probably similar to mine. Almost anything is better than that. Go back to the 'disagreement' of writing woof woof woof woof post after post, I prefer that 'disagreement.' "At the most I disagree with them." gasp