Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Z Best Place to Talk Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Stocks who wrote (40744)	6/18/2002 1:20:02 PM
From: BWAC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53068

Does it have a fully depreciated greenhouse I can dismantle and move?

To: Joe Stocks who wrote (40744)	6/18/2002 1:49:15 PM
From: Nemer	Respond to of 53068

GLW .. my past 30day read and the manner which I would've traded on GLW is short from 6.05 Monday May 20th with a trailing getout stopper all the way down to where a cover would come about at 4.60 early morning of June 5th (gain of 1.45 per share) I would remain flat on GLW until early morning of June 6th when a new short position would've started at 4.50 and been taken out for a stopperloss at 4.60 midafternoon of June 7th (loss of 10cents per share) and a NEW short at 4.50 late afternoon of the same June 7 would've kept a trailing cover on the short until early morning of June 17 where I'd have SARed and gone long at 4.05 (gain of 45cents per share) I would still be long from yesterday at 4.05 with a cover right now at 4.00 -------------------------------------- that is the way I'd do it and the way I'm most content with .... needless to say --- IF I'm short and not covered out ANY purchase would be a "bad buy" in my estimation and IF I'm long and not stopped out ANY short would be a "bad sell" in my estimation now, that doesn't make MY estimation binding on anyone else, but I'll make money and to heck with "being right" as to the direction (past, present OR future) that I can obtain from my "intrepretation" of fundamentals ... I'm through ranting .... hehehehehe