SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (15428)6/18/2002 4:14:19 PM
From: goldsnow  Respond to of 23908
 
That's a bald-faced lie.>>>

Here you go again. You are just like Soviets: Anyone say anything against their Interest: _Lies!!! Where there is no one lies and obfiscate more than them, Arabs in these particular scenario....Always wanted to prevent, than destroy Israel just could'nt...



To: Thomas M. who wrote (15428)6/19/2002 4:14:00 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 23908
 
Re: In fact, this has been recognized for a long time. The words of UN Resolution 242 35 years ago: "For achieving a just settlement of the refugee problem". Anwar Sadat 35 years ago: "Compensation and a referendum on the future of the Palestinians, without reference to repatriation to their former homes in Israel" as a "reasonable way to solve the problem."

I agree... The crux of the Mideast crisis has always been, and still is, (the status of) Jerusalem:

iht.com

Excerpt:

For the first time in a Palestinian proposal, there is no specific demand for a "right of return" for Palestinian refugees to what is now Israel; the proposal calls for "a just and agreed solution" to the problem. Although it reiterates that East Jerusalem would be the capital of a Palestinian state and West Jerusalem the Israeli capital, it says "the Palestinian side will transfer sovereignty over the Jewish Quarter and the Wailing Wall section of the Western Wall in East Jerusalem to Israel."
_________________________

The Palestinians' right of return was a sideshow.