SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Dave Gore's Trades That Make Sense -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave Gore who wrote (8268)6/18/2002 2:03:19 PM
From: Dave Gore  Respond to of 16631
 
Texas Instruments (TXN) 26.74 +0.10: In morning note, Wachovia initiated with a Buy rating and price target of $31, citing customer base exceeding 30,000, attractive catalog business, and strong customer relationships; leading semiconductor player in communications space, with growth driven by DSP and analog products; diversification in areas such as digital consumer and industrial; dominant position in wireless handset market; new product launches which could propel growth.

***

Cypress Semi (CY) 18.05 +0.13: Stock trading modestly higher for the third consecutive session, getting a lift from Wachovia initiation with a Buy rating and price target of $22, seeing attractive way to play next up cycle in semiconductor industry. Firm believes CY represents compelling investment due to immense operating leverage, stemming from owning its own fabs, and reasonable valuation.

****

I don't necessarily trust analysts, but it's important to still note what they say because many still follow them. Also, I trust them a little more when the whole lot of them begins to upgrade stocks and sectors that have been badly beaten down. They have been upgrading the chip stocks this weeks as all the reaffirmations and besting of earnings have come in.



To: Dave Gore who wrote (8268)6/18/2002 3:44:28 PM
From: Bruce A. Brotnov  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16631
 
Dave, are you distinguishing between " cause and effect" vs "effect and cause"? LOL

Bruce