SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (32549)6/18/2002 3:27:44 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Mick Hume has an interesting essay in the New Statesman about the anti-globalization movement's unthinking dive into Mideast politics

The Anti-Imperialism of Fools
newstatesman.co.uk



To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (32549)6/18/2002 6:03:35 PM
From: Bilow  Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Dennis O'Bell; Re: "They [American Indians] don't practice extremist Islam though, funny thing about that."

The fact is that the American Indians were quite brutal enough without any benefit of modern organized religion. Humans are naturally brutal.

-- Carl



To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (32549)6/19/2002 12:12:47 AM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Does anyone think that Israel may eventually employ these same tactics of bombings against Palestine? Straight ahead military force can be avoided by many, both the civilian and the militant. Sympathetic Palestinians may think their terror of the IDF is similar to Israelis terror at suicide bombings but I think they may be persuaded they are wrong.
The pure randomness accentuates the already considerable terror. Remote controlled car bombs or other devices are easily within their expertise. I know they would cause moral concern in some sectors but like Bomber Harris in WWII few seemed to mind until they viewed the utter devastation. I'm sure the Nazis would have proceeded with fire bombing via buzz bombs etc. if they could have.