Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (166518)	6/18/2002 4:22:39 PM
From: willcousa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Luckily, AMD only needs $70 (was it?) per processor.

To: GVTucker who wrote (166518)	6/18/2002 4:29:27 PM
From: fingolfen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Revenue numbers are now seen to be $620-$700mm, and a "substantial" operating loss to go with it. Yowch... Taking the midpoint of Intel's pre- and post-update numbers, and comparing them to AMD's pre- and post-update numbers is somewhat interesting. Intel cut their numbers roughly 5.2%... AMD cut their numbers over 23%... I repeat... Yowch!

To: GVTucker who wrote (166518)	6/18/2002 4:47:02 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "Revenue numbers are now seen to be $620-$700mm, and a "substantial" operating loss to go with it." biz.yahoo.com "The Company's projection made in connection with the release of first quarter results was for second quarter sales to be within the $820 million to $900 million range." Overall, a $200M lower forecast. The report also says that AMD flash is expected to show sequential growth, so the major downfall seems to be coming from microprocessors. wbmw