To: Montana Wildhack who wrote (9846 ) 6/18/2002 11:34:35 PM From: axial Respond to of 14101 "At least he admitted up front that he's shorting the stock. None of this will matter when the aliens abduct us. The truth is out there." ______________________________________________________ Well, if posting has any "ethics" about it (and it probably doesn't, but it should), I guess it would be that one's agenda be known. Most (though not all) posters here have been clear on that. Doesn't mean, as we count the zeros after our shares, that we're not aware of the Winds of Change, the Winds of Chance, and the Shifting Sand Under our Feet. We're not blind. We know, too. And we know there are many things we don't know. (TTINTO - The Thing I Never Thought Of ). Many of us stand to lose substantially - almost completely - if we have it wrong. So we better get it right. We ask, only, that the "evidence" posted for or against DMX be logical, and consistent with the known facts. Or, just be labelled as "opinion". If some poster - any poster - came up with a logically acceptable, and factually consistent post proving DMX is a failure - would I sell? Damned right. Better to lose a little than lose a lot. "They" don't seem to realize that. The Question is not Belief - for or against DMX - the Question is the Quality of the Evidence, the Quality of the Argument. Belief is for the faithful. Me, I'm Agnostic. We've all bought the puzzle, complete with the "fuzzy" pieces, that fit any way you want. For some, the puzzle lies finished on the table, while they sip their beverage of choice and chat with friends in another room. Others? Well, you know... Jim (Congrats on your latest buys, Wolf. Outstanding price. Me green. Long on NT? Thrill seeker!)