Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edscharp who wrote (78239)	6/19/2002 11:55:56 AM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 122087

OK, let's do a case study of the below posters who've lately been gracing Packeteer's (PKTR) Yahoo thread: 1) Rottencore search.messages.yahoo.com 2) LargeUnitInPants search.messages.yahoo.com I guess the first question would be, who among you might also be one or both of the two posters highlighted above? The second question is why do they behave the way they do (do their children read their writing?)? The third question is have they targeted a low float? The fourth question is how many are in on it? The fifth question is PKTR consistently had been trading from six to seven bucks over the past month. Suddenly, appear the merry group of kind-hearted rottencores and largeunitinpants posters, the floor drops out and suddenly PKTR hits under five. How come? And what's amazing about this is PKTR surely will soon return to seven. So who gets screwed in the process? Me bets it's some mom and pop types who sold in a panic. Most real longs would know a short attack was in process, they'd hold and eventually the stock would be trading back to where they knew it should be. You see, it's the mom and pops who the A@P and TripleT types label as "suckers." How can they label the scamsters as "suckers" since the scamsters themselves are looking for "suckers?"

To: Edscharp who wrote (78239)	6/19/2002 12:49:11 PM
From: TripleT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Yea, I guess you're right. There's nothing more irritating for than for the RAH, RAH or NAY, NAY hostile posts. There can be and should be reason(s) on both sides. Maybe I'm having a senior moment, but I can't remember of posting a hostile post with no rational reason/discussion to post. Occasionally however, I have blasted a poster for excessive use of foul language. Normally they have nothing to discuss anyway. You wouldn't be Canadian, would you? My inlaws are Canadian. TTT