Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (265281)	6/19/2002 3:40:18 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769667

I think, in addition, they could beat Landrieux in Louisiana. Because so many people are defective in character and intellect in New Jersey, they will continue to vote for "Honest Bob" Torricelli, and not even have a clue that there might be something wrong with that...

To: greenspirit who wrote (265281)	6/19/2002 3:46:25 PM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Oh yeah Mike...the check is in the mail! AHAHAHAHAHAHHA to support THIS BULLSHIT..... an internal EPA memo just produced as Congress starts considering the dumping of toxic sludge suggests that dumping sludge into the Potomac River may actually be GOOD for fish — okay? — by forcing them to flee waters frequented by fishermen and hide in less accessible areas. EPA says toxic sludge is good for fish washtimes.com The document says it is not a "ridiculous possibility" that a discharge "actually protects the fish in that they are not inclined to bite (and get eaten by humans) but they go ahead with their upstream movement and egg laying." The House Resources Committee will hold a hearing today on the sludge dumping, first reported by The Washington Times, calling in top Cabinet officials to explain why they allow it. "To suggest that toxic sludge is good for fish because it prevents them from being caught by man is like suggesting that we club baby seals to death to prevent them from being eaten by sharks. It's ludicrous," said Rep. George P. Radanovich, California Republican and chairman of the subcommittee on national parks, recreation and public lands. "This is one of the most frightening examples of bureaucratic ineptitude and backward logic I have ever seen," Mr. Radanovich said. Yeah....for sure that's the kind of EPA I DIDN'T VOTE FOR! all thanks to the great EPA post that W gave us.....dear dear GAIL. what a joke this administration is..... CC