SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (166628)6/19/2002 3:48:05 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd  Respond to of 186894
 
Considering the nature of the complaint against RMBS, I think INTC would be in the clear. Basically, the FTC is claiming that RMBS was playing both sides towards the middle: simultaneously lobbying to have RDRAM blessed by standards bodies, and quietly patenting the technology.

Hard to see how anybody could tie INTC to that.

Frankly, I think their suit is pretty weak, and more likely to be taken as a warning than anything else. Particularly as RDRAM is hardly a compelling standard.

The message will be: If you're going to try to establish an industry standard around your technology, you'd better be forthcoming about how proprietary the technology is.

mg



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (166628)6/19/2002 3:52:37 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"Jim, spare us the scary stories. I think Intel is in more danger of a nuke going off in Haifa than a bunch of two-bit lawyers who think they can attach Intel to the Rambus antitrust investigation."

I dunno which would be worse...

Jim