Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers (REFR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (2648)	6/20/2002 1:29:01 AM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50104

Kevin, Don't you find it odd that no one who was actually at the meeting agreed with the article? Why wasn't THV's marketing and sales of SPD windows starting next mentioned? Didn't he hear Larry Smith say they were sending out 1000 PDKs as part of their marketing. And didn't he hear Saxe reiterate full profit for 2003? And why did he MISQUOTE Saxe. I have a recording of the meeting in which Saxe said quite the opposite of what was quoted. He said, "Hopefully, it WON'T be a long time before we have to pay taxes," by which he meant they expect to exceed 32 million in revenue in a short period of time. Why did Harrington misquote that. I am sending a copy of the tape to his editor and asking the same question. Why wasn't Hitachi Chemical's president quoted? He mentioned GM but made no mention of the Mercedes tour bus with 6 SPD sun roofs? or the fact that SPD Inc couldn't be at the meeting because they were in Germany in talks with Mercedes. Harrington wrote another article that was not complimentary about REFR. I think now that the short position can't use Asensio to get some negative press out they are using other sources. Very suspicious and unbalanced piece. Doesn't change the fact that THV IS selling SPD windows next month now does it. As I said, REFR longs are more intelligent than that. We aren't going to sell our shares which represent our ownership of SPD. We get dividends from the royalties. SUBSTANTIAL royalties Kevin, these are humungous markets. No one is buying REFR because of N. Dixon. The people I know in this stock are like Al Malvino, educated, knowledgeable visionaries who know the impact SPD is going to have in the glass industry. The shorts, on the other hand, have been fined, censured, their trading practices described as illegal. They are uneducated, unscrupulous individuals who are only brave in packs and attack innocent people, making heinous accusations in order to not lose money on their position. Well it's too late. Shorts need to buy 2,200,000 shares of REFR. Long term shareholders are buying more shares. Long term shareholders aren't selling. The volume is 14,000. Most of the shares I own and will be buying are going out of circulation for years. We know what we own and we know the people involved in trying to separate us from our shares. Won't work. ND