SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Fleming who wrote (23965)6/20/2002 11:26:17 AM
From: jackmore  Respond to of 197028
 
>>...NOK mgmt hinted that it is possible that China Unicom could reevaluate its CDMA strategy...<<

Shades of their peek-a-boo phone trick. NOK has no shame. Maybe they know they aren't going to be selling CDMA into China for quite some time.



To: Mark Fleming who wrote (23965)6/20/2002 11:31:37 AM
From: kech  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197028
 
NOK mgmt hinted that it is possible that China Unicom could reevaluate its CDMA strategy

Nok management, that is a reliable source on Unicom. And they say this on the same day that they say they want to build CDMA phones in China - presumably for the Chinese market? Which press release to believe? <g>



To: Mark Fleming who wrote (23965)6/20/2002 11:39:34 AM
From: Jeff Vayda  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197028
 
That's a rich rumor from briefing.com. Who would China Unicom sell the CDMA network to - just another state sponsored company!

It makes no difference. The Chinese see that to handle the growing use and to gain expertise for indigenous producers, CDMA is the only choice.

Until CDMA shows a clear advantage, people will remain with their current provider. That's the way it is. Japan is showing what can happen in a market where a clearly superior product is available. The question is: "How long until each CDMA market develops to the point of clear advantage?" Given the investment climate, I think it will be longer than most of us would prefer.

Jeff Vayda



To: Mark Fleming who wrote (23965)6/20/2002 11:45:47 AM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 197028
 
This horse shit is incredible. It comes on the heels of the report about Nokia considering selling a low-end CDMA phone in China.

What gives?



To: Mark Fleming who wrote (23965)6/20/2002 12:10:21 PM
From: Ramsey Su  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 197028
 
before anyone gets too bent out of shape, I opine that the probability of this being true is not high, especially the way briefing reported it.

Why? Unicom had totally abandoned the gsm - gprs migration path while 1x is already in place for 7 major cities. It would be rather difficult, not to mention costly, for them to reverse course.

However, let us assume it is true, then the exact reverse of what lehman suggested would be true. It will be wildly bullish for most of the companies named.

Why?

1. unicom cdma would not have to worry about stealing customers from unicom gsm. WAR.

2. there are only 3 potential buyers - telecom, netcom and railcom.

3. all 3 above supposedly got huge war chest and are salivating to get into wireless arena.

4. war chest = cap ex = happy vendors.



To: Mark Fleming who wrote (23965)6/20/2002 12:44:29 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Respond to of 197028
 
possibly by selling the struggling network
> in order to focus exclusively on its healthy GSM biz (checks suggest that
> Unicom is considering this as well


who would they sell to? how 'bout QCOM? it could be like Vesper/Pegaso all over again. i sure hope QCOM doesn't bite. just another reason mgmt needs the discipline of a dividend payment to keep on top of their game.