SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : A to Z Junior Mining Research Site -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 4figureau who wrote (231)6/20/2002 1:34:16 PM
From: 4figureau  Respond to of 5423
 
SML hit .28

88 Versus bought 165,000 shares today.



To: 4figureau who wrote (231)6/20/2002 1:38:30 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5423
 
ghm.v - Glenhaven getting the front-page-'o-kitco pump today - kitco.com ... i'm in for a few, had it on watchlist but never bought any until .33 this morning ... this Vaughn guy can really move 'em, look back on what he did with Seabridge and X-Cal ... so far he hasn't got ghm even to its 52-wk, i would expect this push to extend to tomorrow ... ?? ... play is based on Red Lake closeology - redlakeresources.com - they're going to change the name to Red Lake soon, that'll be a nostalgia hit

4au and Liz, thanks for talking up the Stealth sml.v, i was able to add shares starting at .16 last week ... somebody was talking about it months ago, was that you tyke? ... i searched about four threads, couldn't find a reference using either name or ticker ... maybe it was somebody offline ..... anyway, i got a few more today, .20s and a few .24s ... definitely a nice pick, though i have yet to form an opinion on management, never having spoken with them, but the numbers i like very much

Couple of great articles - kitco.com
financialsense.com



To: 4figureau who wrote (231)6/20/2002 2:09:16 PM
From: GeoDude  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5423
 
4F,

A couple of comments on SML vs NGX (keep in mind that I view SML as a good speculative play with many unanswered questions.

1) gold grade at NGX is higher than SML (0.7 vs 0.4g/t). Cu grade similar. The profits are in the gold so this is bad.

2) NGX has proven reserves, SML has a WAG resource estimate

3) NGX has $200MM worth of plant and equipment paid for (debt removed very recently).

4) I don't think NGX will have spare capacity for a while i.e. they don't need SML's ore and SML would have to build a $200MM+ facility to monetize their reserves.

5) When comparing purchase/acquisition price, you should be real careful in using gold-equivalent figure when Cu is involved due to the different view on price of Cu vs Au. I would guess Cu-converted to gold would attract a lesser valuation than pure gold.

Conclusion: SML is an interesting play but they need to discover some higher grade stuff (than NGX) to make their property worth something. Until then, it is only a trading play.

Caveat: if Au or Cu prices go up and up, the above is less important and the stock will skyrocket ...

IMHO of course

LIA