Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : A to Z Junior Mining Research Site -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackjc who wrote (239)	6/21/2002 12:30:31 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5423

ngt.v/aas.v - what gets me here is the price differential, hard to explain even considering relative financing dynamics recently ... Alamos is getting more attention than National out of the NLWs lately it seems, and i don't see good reason for that - sure Alamos has other properties and Chester Millar, but to discount the whole-camp potential of Salamandra on top of its proven ounces and Albert Matter as well, even a 3-to-4 ratio is overly discounted imho [a few days ago it was 5-to-8, .50 against .80] .... i did get a very few ngt at a hair over .50 average, but lost opportunity stink-bidding others just a little too low, like Candente where i missed twice by a penny, lol Do you think M&M will hammer out an agreement before the ngt AGM? ... will they ever? .... i think russ is right here, those two together, providing they can work as a team, along with combined assets would make a serious little mid-tier producer/explorer in no time ..... if, if, if ...... they remain good holds as separate cooperating companies i'm sure, but they could be so much more ... eh ghm.v - wooo, up to 354k volume ... front page o' kitco again this morning, heh heh ... lots of paper coming out at this level though, some days it's possible to get a little cynical about this promo stuff -g- 325.60, damas y caballeros - kitco.com