SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (51704)6/21/2002 10:26:55 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
:-)
I think children have much bigger problems facing them than libraries and the possibility they might see porn there. I think children are important too, and yet, we come to different conclusions. I am much more worried about drugs and alcohol when it comes to my own children. I know our library has rules for use of the computers by children- this is mostly to keep the kids from hogging the computers by going to game cites.



To: goldworldnet who wrote (51704)6/21/2002 10:28:17 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
They could do that or have separate computers. I will not approve of concessions beyond that.

That's just the point. Libraries should be able to use other methodologies such as separate computers or monitoring usage to protect children. The law that is being defended specifies a specific methodology, one that doesn't work very well. Libraries should have flexibility to solve the problem in their own way.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News