SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Les H who wrote (174298)6/21/2002 10:41:46 AM
From: Petrol  Respond to of 436258
 
<<Mr. Roque says he believes it is correct to compare the Nasdaq's decline to that of the Dow in 1929-32 because both bear markets were preceded by a bubble.

"We figure that's more than enough reason for us to be cautious, if not, bearish," he concluded.>>

The title of that article is misleading - it's not a bear trap!



To: Les H who wrote (174298)6/21/2002 10:55:13 AM
From: clochard  Respond to of 436258
 
Indexes are averages with limited meaning. If the average of all Nasdaq stocks goes into the dirt, it doesn't mean that all of them are bad. Some are good and others are shit. But if people want to use the index as a measure of their net worth (having bought an index fund for example) then they pay the price of simplicity.



To: Les H who wrote (174298)6/21/2002 1:33:52 PM
From: benwood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
While many think the 70.84% decline the Nasdaq has suffered is pretty severe and rivals the 1929-1932 decline of 89.19%, and so believe the worst must be about over, a relative comparison with the decline of the Great Depression tells a different tale. If the Nasdaq ultimately ends up 89.19% down, that would be a further 63% drop from Wednesday's close. I'll be buying some of ACF's stock on that day (but not much... I will be waiting for the bottom).